JessicaStage2

=Stage 2 Determine Acceptable Evidence.=

Multimedia Product Rubric; Presentation, Attractiveness, Content, Originality, Workload and Reflection, Sources Oral Presentation Rubric; Organization, Content Knowledge, Visuals, Delivery || • **imovie/video:** Demonstrate a crime scene forensics technique for collecting evidence from a crime scene •**"Argument map" // Not really time to complete this. //(**http://www.amap.org.uk/create/ - //Argue by mapping out complex debates in a simple visual format//): Display evidence collected from the crime scene in the book and show how it supports a scientific argument of who committed the crime. • T**imeline maker/Venn Diagram:** Show the advances in crime scene analysis since the 1970's, compare and contrast • **Collaborative Story Maker** ** // Not really time to complete this. // **** (plot Diagram readwritethink.org): ** Consider how advances in forensic technology would of changed the outcome of the novel. • **Xtranormal:** ** // Not really time to complete this, save this for another unit. // ** that shows how biases in analyzing evidence can lead investigators down the wrong path. || =Assessment Task Blue Print //(For the GRASP)//=
 * **Performance Task** (Summary in G.R.A.S.P.S. form): **(T)** ||
 * **Goal:**Present evidence using current forensic techniques that help to convict the killer in the book.
 * Role:**You are a crime scene forensic scientist
 * Audience:** A judge and jury.
 * Situation:** You need to convince a judge using the evidence from the crime scene and explaining the scientific techniques used to analyze the evidence that Mr. Harvey is the killer.
 * Product/Presentation:** //**Prezi**//: Present forensic evidence to a fictional judge and jury and how it points to Mr. Harvey, imbed a video demonstrating a forensic technique.
 * Standards (criteria from both rubrics):**
 * Other Evidence (quizzes, test, prompts, observations, dialogues, work sample, etc.):**
 * Other Evidence **(OE) type 1 --> type 2 technology** ||
 * •**Google Docs:** Collaborative lab report to describe how electrophoresis works and display results from the analysis of crime scene data compared to possible suspects.
 * •**Google Docs:** Collaborative lab report to describe how electrophoresis works and display results from the analysis of crime scene data compared to possible suspects.
 * Student Self-Assessment and Reflection**
 * Self-Assessment **(SA)** ||
 * * Pre-Assessment: KWL, warm-up questions on whiteboards, Probes for misunderstandings
 * Checking for Understanding (formative, not necessarily graded) 6 possible strategies: Think/Pair/Shares, Exit Slips, Science Journal Entries, Lab Reflection Questions, Teacher will check in with groups on their progress with their research using content specific questions, venn diagram
 * Timely Feedback (student, peer, teacher): Quizzes, Peer Editing, Lab Feedback, venn diagram feedback from teacher
 * Reflection (optional): Science journals ||

//**What understandings/goals will be assessed through this task?**// **(G)**
 * **Understanding** || **Goal (MLR)** ||
 * * scientists perform electrophoresis analysis to identify and consider possible suspects by comparing DNA collected from a crime scene to possible suspects.
 * crime scene forensics have improved due to technological advances.
 * evidence must be used in order to support a scientific argument. || * Describe how scientists defend their evidence and explanations using logical arguments and verifiable results.
 * Provide an example that shows how science advances with the introduction of new technological problems often impacts new scientific knowledge.
 * Describe the role of DNA sequences in determining a match between the evidence and possible suspects. ||

What criteria are implied in the standard(s) understanding(s) regardless of the task specifics? What qualities must student work demonstrate to signify that standards were met?
 * **Big Idea** || **Big Idea** ||
 * •Scientists must analyse evidence to support scientific arguments || •Crime scene analysis has advanced due to new technology ||

//**Through what authentic performance task will students demonstrate understandings?**//
 * //**Task Description:**// **(T)** ||
 * You will present evidence using current forensic techniques to help convict, Mr. Harvey, from the evidence presented in the novel. You will take on the role of a crime scene forensic scientist to process the crime scene, using modern forensic techniques. You will then present the evidence to a fictitious judge and jury. You must convince this judge and jury through a Prezi Presentation, incorporating the video analysis of the evidence from the crime scene, and a description of how the evidence was analyzed, that Mr. Harvey is the killer. ||

//**What student products/performances will provide evidence of desired understandings?**//
 * **Type II Product** || **Type of Presentation** ||
 * •Prezi, with imbedded video and audio || •Oral ||

//**By what criteria will student products/performances be evaluated?**// (MAMHS MODIFIED oral presentation rubric) || • Attractiveness • Originality • Workload and Reflection • Sources || • Presentation • Content Knowledge • Visuals • Delivery ||
 * **Product Criteria - MultiMedia** || **Presentation Criteria**
 * • Content
 * 2004 ASCD and Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe**